Depreciation & used values · Crossover SUV

Mazda CX-30 depreciation

The Mazda CX-30 loses about 37% of its value in its first three years. From a list price of £33,000, a 2023 example with around 22,000 miles on the clock is worth about £19,750 today. The year-by-year table below values every age of CX-30 at its typical mileage, from the same model behind its full profile.

Value by registration year

What a used CX-30 is worth, year by year

Each row values that year's CX-30 at its typical mileage (7,279 miles a year). The headline is the midpoint of a private sale and a dealer forecourt price; the range reflects condition and history.

Reg yearAgeTypical milesEst. valueLikely rangeOf new price
2026<1 yr3,500£31,200£28,050£34,35095%
20251 yr7,500£29,300£26,250£32,40093%
20242 yrs14,500£24,500£21,800£27,15082%
20233 yrs22,000£19,750£17,500£22,00069%
20224 yrs29,000£16,050£14,150£17,90061%
20215 yrs36,500£13,450£11,800£15,05053%
20206 yrs43,500£11,300£9,900£12,75046%
20197 yrs51,000£9,550£8,300£10,75041%

Values are the Forecourt model's estimate at each age's typical mileage, not offers. For a specific mileage, trim and region, use the full CX-30 profile →

The depreciation curve

Share of original value retained by age (to 7 years). The same curve drives the interactive chart on the profile.

Best time to buy or sell

HoldFair value — depreciation is moderating

  • Loses about 13% a year around 3 years old
  • UK numbers growing (+24.8% year on year)
  • Reliability 92/100

CX-30 depreciation — quick answers

How much does a Mazda CX-30 depreciate?

The Mazda CX-30 loses about 37% of its value in the first three years. A 2023 example with around 22,000 miles is worth about £19,750 today.

What is a 2023 Mazda CX-30 worth?

A 2023 Mazda CX-30 at a typical 22,000 miles is worth about £19,750 — likely between £17,500 and £22,000 depending on condition and history.

When is the best time to buy or sell a Mazda CX-30?

Fair value — depreciation is moderating. It loses about 12.7% a year around 3 years old.

SearchCompare with