Head to head · Coupe SUV (EV)
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Toyota C-HR+
On the measures that matter most to a used buyer — value retention, reliability, fuel economy and insurance — the Toyota C-HR+ comes out ahead of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, winning 1 of the 1 categories where the two differ.
Estimated data — some figures here come from an estimated profile rather than a fully hand-checked one. Treat them as a guide, not gospel.
| Measure | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron | Toyota C-HR+ |
|---|---|---|
| Est. value, ~3 years old | £26,650 (2023, 25,500 mi) | £32,450 (2026, 5,000 mi) |
| Value kept after 3 years | 50% | 50% |
| Reliability (MOT-derived, /100) | 80 | 80 |
| Average mpg | — | — |
| Insurance group | 38 | 33 · wins |
| Road tax / year | £195 | £195 |
| Typical annual service | £380 | £300 · wins |
Valuations are each model's ~3-year-old example at typical mileage, through the same model behind the profiles. Adjust mileage, trim and condition in the interactive comparison →
Q4 Sportback e-tron vs C-HR+ — quick answers
How much does a used Q4 Sportback e-tron cost compared with a C-HR+?
A roughly three-year-old Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is worth about £26,650 at typical mileage, against about £32,450 for the equivalent Toyota C-HR+.