Head to head · Crossover SUV
Ford Puma vs Nissan Juke
On value retention, reliability, fuel economy and insurance, the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke finish level — the right pick comes down to which measures matter most to you.
| Measure | Ford Puma | Nissan Juke |
|---|---|---|
| Est. value, ~3 years old | £12,400 (2023, 25,500 mi) | £10,800 (2023, 23,000 mi) |
| Value kept after 3 years | 59% | 63% · wins |
| Reliability (MOT-derived, /100) | 90 · wins | 82 |
| Average mpg | 48 · wins | 46 |
| Insurance group | 13 | 12 · wins |
| Road tax / year | £200 | £200 |
| Typical annual service | £240 | £185 · wins |
Valuations are each model's ~3-year-old example at typical mileage, through the same model behind the profiles. Adjust mileage, trim and condition in the interactive comparison →
Puma vs Juke — quick answers
Which is more reliable, the Puma or the Juke?
The Ford Puma scores higher on Forecourt's MOT-derived reliability measure — 90 against the Nissan Juke's 82 out of 100.
Which holds its value better, the Puma or the Juke?
The Nissan Juke — it keeps about 63% of its original price after three years, against 59% for the Ford Puma.
How much does a used Puma cost compared with a Juke?
A roughly three-year-old Ford Puma is worth about £12,400 at typical mileage, against about £10,800 for the equivalent Nissan Juke.