Head to head · Coupe SUV (EV)
Polestar 4 vs Toyota C-HR+
On the measures that matter most to a used buyer — value retention, reliability, fuel economy and insurance — the Toyota C-HR+ comes out ahead of the Polestar 4, winning 1 of the 1 categories where the two differ.
Estimated data — some figures here come from an estimated profile rather than a fully hand-checked one. Treat them as a guide, not gospel.
| Measure | Polestar 4 | Toyota C-HR+ |
|---|---|---|
| Est. value, ~3 years old | £29,750 (2024, 15,500 mi) | £32,450 (2026, 5,000 mi) |
| Value kept after 3 years | 50% | 50% |
| Reliability (MOT-derived, /100) | 70 | 80 · wins |
| Average mpg | — | — |
| Insurance group | 33 | 33 |
| Road tax / year | £195 | £195 |
| Typical annual service | £290 · wins | £300 |
Valuations are each model's ~3-year-old example at typical mileage, through the same model behind the profiles. Adjust mileage, trim and condition in the interactive comparison →
4 vs C-HR+ — quick answers
Which is more reliable, the 4 or the C-HR+?
The Toyota C-HR+ scores higher on Forecourt's MOT-derived reliability measure — 80 against the Polestar 4's 70 out of 100.
How much does a used 4 cost compared with a C-HR+?
A roughly three-year-old Polestar 4 is worth about £29,750 at typical mileage, against about £32,450 for the equivalent Toyota C-HR+.