Head to head · Crossover SUV (EV)
Smart #1 vs Mini Aceman
On value retention, reliability, fuel economy and insurance, the Smart #1 and Mini Aceman finish level — the right pick comes down to which measures matter most to you.
| Measure | Smart #1 | Mini Aceman |
|---|---|---|
| Est. value, ~3 years old | £19,100 (2023, 23,000 mi) | £23,300 (2024, 15,500 mi) |
| Value kept after 3 years | 65% · wins | 50% |
| Reliability (MOT-derived, /100) | — | — |
| Average mpg | — | — |
| Insurance group | 22 | 20 · wins |
| Road tax / year | £200 | £200 |
| Typical annual service | £185 | £185 |
Valuations are each model's ~3-year-old example at typical mileage, through the same model behind the profiles. Adjust mileage, trim and condition in the interactive comparison →
#1 vs Aceman — quick answers
Which holds its value better, the #1 or the Aceman?
The Smart #1 — it keeps about 65% of its original price after three years, against 50% for the Mini Aceman.
How much does a used #1 cost compared with a Aceman?
A roughly three-year-old Smart #1 is worth about £19,100 at typical mileage, against about £23,300 for the equivalent Mini Aceman.